首页> 外文OA文献 >‘It's been hell.’ Italian and British practice educators’ narratives of working with struggling or failing social work students in practice learning settings [E’ stato un inferno! Racconti di supervisori di toricinio che han lavorato con studenti problematici o che non hanno superato il tirocinio]
【2h】

‘It's been hell.’ Italian and British practice educators’ narratives of working with struggling or failing social work students in practice learning settings [E’ stato un inferno! Racconti di supervisori di toricinio che han lavorato con studenti problematici o che non hanno superato il tirocinio]

机译:“真是地狱。”意大利和英国的实践教育者“关于在实践学习环境中与处境艰难或失败的社会工作学生一起工作的叙述[真是地狱!与有问题的学生一起工作或未通过实习的胸腺导师的故事]

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Periods of assessed learning in practice settings are common requirements for social work students world wide. The ‘practice learning opportunity’ as it is known in the UK, and ‘tirocinio di servizio sociale’ as it is referred to in Italy, are important sites of gatekeeping in preventing unsuitable people from becoming social workers. The experience of assessing failing students in practice learning settings however, has been found to be particularly stressful and challenging for practice educators. This article documents findings from two qualitative studies that explored field educators’ experiences of working with struggling or failing social work students in Italy and England. The study finds both similarities and differences in the narratives of the assessors from the two countries Similarities include, unpleasant emotional experience of working with a failing student, internalisation of the students failing as the practice educators’ own failing, perceptions that the universities may hide negative information about students and lack of acknowledgement of the gatekeeping function inherent in the practice educator role. Differences include the level of emotionality experienced by educators, the way students are spoken about and the perceived role and responses of the university. Further comparative European research which focuses on practice education is indicated.
机译:在实践环境中进行评估学习的时间段是全世界社会工作学生的普遍要求。在英国,人们称为“实践学习机会”,而在意大利,则称为“蒂罗西尼奥社会服务”,是防止不合适的人成为社会工作者的重要场所。然而,已经发现在实践学习环境中评估失败学生的经验对于实践教育者而言尤其具有压力和挑战性。本文记录了两项定性研究的发现,这些研究探索了田野教育工作者与意大利和英国陷入困境或失败的社会工作学生一起工作的经验。研究发现,两国评估者的叙述既有相似之处,也有不同之处。相似之处包括,与失败的学生合作的令人不快的情感经历,由于实践教育者自身的失败而使学生内部化的失败,对大学可能隐藏负面的看法有关学生的信息,以及缺乏对实践教育者角色固有的守门功能的认可。差异包括教育者所经历的情感水平,对学生的交谈方式以及大学的感知角色和反应。指出了针对实践教育的进一步的欧洲比较研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Finch, Jo; Poletti, Alberto;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号